
Content
- What “No Limits” Can Mean in a UK Casino
- No-Limit Betting and the Limits That Remain
- Table Limits Are Not Slot Limits
- Roulette and Blackjack: No Verified Table Caps
- High Limits Meet the Slot Stake Cap
- High-Limit Slots Under UK Rules
- High-Limit Casinos and the Limits of the Evidence
- Setting a Spending Limit Before Play
- A “No-Limit Casino” Still Has Rules
- Real-Money Play and Bonus Wagering Caps
The phrase can suggest high stakes or broad game choice, but it does not remove UK regulation or the limits that still apply.
What “No Limits” Can Mean in a UK Casino
“No limits” sounds like a promise of open-ended play. In a casino advert, though, the phrase may describe an image rather than a complete account of how gambling is governed. It can suggest freedom from restrictive tables, a broad choice of games or a high ceiling on stakes. Without precise terms attached, it does not establish which of those meanings is intended. Nor does it turn a casino into a place beyond regulation.
That distinction matters in the United Kingdom, where the Gambling Commission regulates gambling activity, including remote gambling offered to consumers in Great Britain. Its authority does not depend on where a company keeps the equipment that runs its service. A business cannot make the regulatory question disappear by placing its servers elsewhere. The rule follows the market being served.
There is a useful difference between a phrase used to sell an experience and the status of the business providing it. “No limits” is not a licence category. It does not, by itself, identify who operates the casino, who is responsible for the service or which terms apply when a bet is placed. In regulated play, those questions lead back to the operator and its obligations, not to the flourish in a headline.
The Commission is the sole regulator for commercial gambling in Great Britain. It issues operating licences to businesses and personal licences to individuals working in relevant roles. Those are different permissions: one concerns the company offering gambling, the other the people operating within the system. The distinction is an administrative one, but it reflects a larger idea. Gambling is not treated simply as a private exchange between a game and a player; it is an organised commercial activity with identifiable responsibilities.
Big Jackpot Slots at UK Online Casinos: Rules
A search for a no-limit casino UK may therefore begin with an attractive phrase and end with a more practical question: what exactly is being described? If the words refer to the range of games or the feel of a particular product, that is one matter. If they appear to promise that a player can stake any amount, they are making a stronger claim. The wording alone cannot settle that claim. It needs to be read alongside the operator’s actual terms and the rules governing the relevant kind of play.
This is not pedantry. Casino language has long borrowed from ideas of abundance and escape: the suggestion that, inside the venue, ordinary constraints fall away. In a physical casino, the architecture itself can help sustain that impression. Online, the same promise is compressed into a few words on a screen. Yet a licensed remote gambling service remains part of a regulated market, however expansive its branding sounds. The atmosphere may be boundless; the business is not outside the system.
“Online casinos with no betting limits” is also an imprecise description because it can blur together different games and different meanings of a limit. A phrase might refer to a particular betting option, a promotional claim or an overall impression of scale. Those are not interchangeable. The wording does not tell anyone whether it concerns a table, a slot, a maximum stake, or some other feature. Treating the label as a technical definition would give advertising copy more authority than it has earned.
The UK regulatory framework is concerned with the activity offered to consumers, not merely the address printed in a company’s paperwork. For remote gambling in Great Britain, the location of key equipment does not remove the Commission’s role. That principle prevents geography from becoming a convenient disguise: a service aimed at the British market cannot be understood solely by looking at where its machinery sits.
This also explains why a list of casinos carrying a “no limits” label would not answer the underlying question by itself. A name can tell little about what the phrase means in that particular setting, and a promotional description cannot establish that every form of play is unrestricted. The operator’s licensed status and the terms attached to the activity are more meaningful than the breadth implied by a slogan.
Nolimit City Slots at UK Casinos: What to Check
In ordinary language, “no limits” often means “more choice” or “less restrictive than elsewhere”. In regulated gambling, it should be read as a claim requiring context, not as a statement that rules have vanished. The Commission’s remit remains in place; the operator remains the responsible business. A casino may invite an impression of limitless possibility. Regulation asks who is offering it, and under what authority.
The distinction is simple, even if the marketing is not. “No limits” describes a promise made in words. It does not decide the legal status of the casino, and it cannot by itself define the boundaries of play. Those belong to the regulated service behind the phrase. A slogan is not a licence.
Recommended online casinos
- SlotoSportBonus: 500% up to £ 10 200+ 777 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- ChanzeBonus: Slots Welcome Bonus #1 200% up to €500 · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- x3betBonus: Welcome Pack 100% Up to £1.000 + 200 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- Revery PlayBonus: 100% up to€1,000+ 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- AmunbetBonus: Join now and get 450% up to 2,700 GBP + 450 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- NightLuckBonus: Welcome Pack + 805% Up To 6400€ + 280 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- DieselwinBonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- SpinFormulaBonus: 550% Up To £15,000 + 550 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- NightWinBonus: £900 + 400 free spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- EvoSpinBonus: 125% up to €2500 + 125 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
No-Limit Betting and the Limits That Remain
A casino’s claim to have “no limits” can sound like a statement about every wager it accepts. In practice, the phrase needs a narrower reading. A betting limit is not one universal ceiling attached to an entire casino; the rules can depend on the game and the way a stake is placed. A slogan does not make those distinctions disappear.
For online slots in Great Britain, a statutory stake cap now sets a clear boundary. Since 9 April 2025, the maximum stake per game cycle has been £5 for players aged 25 and over. For players aged 18 to 24, the cap is £2 per game cycle, effective from 21 May 2025. These are limits on a particular kind of play, not a general declaration about every wager across a casino.
That distinction matters when a site describes itself as an online casino with no betting limits. The phrase may refer to a particular feature, a selected game or a comparison with the operator’s own lower limits. It cannot mean that a slot player may stake any amount on a single game cycle. The legal cap remains, however expansive the promotional wording sounds.
Play’n GO Slots at UK Casinos: What Can Be Verified
Nor should the slot cap be carried over in the opposite direction and treated as a ceiling for every casino product. It governs online slots. It does not, by itself, establish a shared maximum for all forms of casino betting. A player moving between games is moving between different sets of rules, not finding one number that quietly governs the whole lobby.
This is where the expression “high limits” can mislead. It often suggests that a casino has room for larger stakes, but the phrase alone does not say which games it concerns or how the operator defines “high”. For slots, the statutory cap cannot be lifted by a label. For other products, a slot rule is not enough to describe their limits. The label is broad; the underlying terms are not.
The difference between a betting limit and a spending limit is also worth keeping in view. A betting limit concerns the stake accepted for a wager or game cycle. A personal spending limit concerns the amount a customer chooses to make available for gambling. They address different things: one sets a boundary around an individual play, the other around a person’s spending. Neither term should be used as a loose substitute for the other.
The online slot rule is unusually easy to state because its unit is specific: a game cycle. That precision helps prevent a familiar confusion between a large balance, a large potential payout and a large permitted stake. They are not interchangeable. A balance may be available in an account, and a game may display a possible win, but neither changes the cap on the stake for a slot cycle.
A “casino without limits” is therefore best understood as a phrase that needs context, not as a literal description of unrestricted betting. On slots, the age-based cap is explicit. Elsewhere, the relevant limit belongs to the relevant product and its terms. The broad claim cannot turn one product’s rule into the rule for all products, or make a legal boundary vanish.
Do
- Distinguish between betting limits and spending limits
- Check the specific rules for each individual game
- Read the operator’s actual terms and conditions
Don’t
- Treat “no limits” as a technical definition
- Assume a slot cap applies to all casino games
- Use a slogan as a substitute for a licence
There is a small social history in the appeal of the phrase. Gambling has long been marketed through the fantasy of an open table, a wager unconfined by ordinary caution. The casino, however, is not a place outside society; it is an industry whose permissions are shaped by public rules. The modern online version carries that tension into a screen: freedom is part of the sales language, while the structure of play remains regulated.
For anyone comparing online casino betting limits, the useful question is not whether a site uses the word “unlimited”, but what the claim applies to. A broad description may refer to an operator’s own terms; it cannot override the statutory cap on online slot stakes. And that cap should not be mistaken for a universal ceiling on every casino game. One phrase, several boundaries.
Table Limits Are Not Slot Limits
The word “limit” does different work at a casino table and on an online slot. A table may present a permitted range for a particular game: a minimum stake to join and a maximum stake for a round. A slot stake, by contrast, is placed on a game cycle. The distinction matters because a rule written for one kind of play cannot simply be carried across to another.
In Britain, the statutory online-slot cap is explicitly tied to slots. For players aged 25 and over, the maximum stake is £5 per game cycle, a rule that took effect on 9 April 2025. For players aged 18 to 24, the cap is £2 per game cycle, effective from 21 May 2025. Those figures define the permitted stake on an online slot; they do not set a universal ceiling for every game in a casino lobby.
IGT Online Casinos UK: How Amatic Fits In
That is the useful boundary. A casino’s slot rules and a table game’s own stake conditions belong to different categories. Seeing a slot cap does not establish what a table will accept, just as a table’s displayed maximum cannot be treated as a limit on slot play. The shared setting is not a shared rulebook.
A table’s limit is attached to the table as presented, rather than to the general label “casino”. Where a game shows a minimum and maximum, those figures describe the terms of that particular table. They are not evidence of a single market-wide ceiling. A different table, even within the same broad category of play, may set out different conditions. The details need to be read where the game is offered, not inferred from a slot regulation.
This can make “casino table limits” sound more settled than they are. The phrase may refer to the stake range at one table, a comparison between tables, or a question about rules applying across an entire operator. Those are not interchangeable. A table-level figure answers a local question; it does not, by itself, describe all online casino limits in the UK.
The interface can blur the distinction. Slots and table games may sit side by side in one lobby, under one account and one set of general terms. That visual unity is a convenience of software, not proof that the games share a stake structure. The slot cap follows the slot game cycle. Table conditions follow the relevant game and table. The menu is not the law.
Slot stake caps are tied to the game cycle, whereas table game limits are attached to the specific table as presented.
Nor does the slot cap tell a player what a table’s minimum stake must be. A maximum and a minimum answer different questions: one is the upper boundary of a permitted stake, the other the entry point for that table. Treating one as a substitute for the other produces a false picture of what a game allows. So does treating the slot figure as a general casino ceiling.
This distinction also matters when a site uses broad promotional language about high or flexible stakes. Such wording does not supply a table’s actual terms. The game screen and its rules are where the stake conditions for that table are expressed. A general description cannot make a particular table’s range self-evident.
For online play, the screen may be the whole room: a felt surface rendered in graphics, a dealer’s image, or a simulated table. Its appearance does not change the basic point. A table game is not an online slot simply because both are accessed through the same remote gambling account. The specific rules attached to the game still matter.
The phrase “online live casino limits” can also conceal two separate ideas. “Live” describes a way of presenting a table game; it does not turn the slot stake cap into a table-game rule. A live table’s stated conditions remain conditions of that table. The slot cap remains a cap for online slots.
In ordinary speech, casino limits can sound like one fence around the whole venue. In practice, the term needs a noun beside it: slot stake, table stake, or another account control. Without that distinction, figures from one part of the lobby can be mistaken for rules governing another. The categories are not decorative. They determine what a number means.
Roulette and Blackjack: No Verified Table Caps
Roulette and blackjack invite a more precise question than whether a casino is “no limit”: what is the permitted stake at a particular table, and does that answer change between a live dealer and a digital game? The regulatory picture does not provide a single roulette or blackjack figure that answers those questions. A label on a casino page cannot fill that gap.
Amatic Games at UK Casinos: Assessing Operators
The UK Gambling Commission oversees gambling in the United Kingdom, including online casinos. Its remit also covers remote gambling offered to consumers in Great Britain, wherever the equipment used to provide it is located. That establishes who regulates the activity; it does not, by itself, set out a roulette minimum, a blackjack maximum or a universal limit for live tables. Those are different kinds of detail.
Roulette: the table matters
Roulette is often presented as though the game itself carries a standard ceiling. In practice, the phrase “table limit” refers to rules attached to a particular table: the smallest permitted stake, any maximum stake, and sometimes restrictions on how much may be placed on an individual betting position. Those details matter because the same game can be offered in different formats and settings. But without a stated table rule, a general claim about casino roulette limits says little about what a particular game allows.
That applies to online roulette as well as a live-dealer table. A digital wheel and a streamed table may both be called roulette, yet the name of the game does not establish their stake ranges. Nor does “live” settle the question: it describes the presentation, not a universal betting ceiling. The relevant information would have to come from the terms shown for the specific table, rather than from assumptions drawn from the game’s name.
This is where “no limits” language can become slippery. It might refer to a casino’s overall marketing, an individual table’s advertised range, or simply the absence of a limit in a particular sentence. Those meanings are not interchangeable. A broad claim does not establish that every roulette table accepts any stake, and a high maximum at one table would not establish the same maximum elsewhere. The wording needs a table attached to it. Otherwise, it is scenery.
Blackjack: a separate set of table rules
Blackjack has its own table conditions. A table’s minimum and maximum stake are not necessarily the same as roulette’s, and the rules for one blackjack table do not automatically describe another. Online blackjack and live blackjack should therefore be read as distinct offerings when their limits are being assessed. The game title alone supplies no figure.
Push Gaming Slots at UK Casinos: Access and Availability
A useful distinction is between a rule governing the game and a limit governing a particular table. The first describes how blackjack is played; the second describes the stakes accepted in that setting. Confusing them can make a casino sound more permissive than its table rules actually are. “Unlimited blackjack” is especially difficult to interpret without a clear statement of what is unlimited: the available stake, the number of tables, or merely a promotional description.
No general online or live blackjack cap can be inferred from the regulator’s role alone. The same is true of roulette. A national regulator’s jurisdiction is not a substitute for the table’s own terms, while a table’s terms do not change the regulator’s responsibility for the gambling activity. Two levels of information, serving different purposes.
Stakes are not withdrawals
Betting limits and withdrawal limits answer separate questions. A table limit concerns how much may be staked in a game; a withdrawal limit concerns how money may be paid out from an account. One cannot be used to calculate the other. A casino’s wording about roulette or blackjack stakes therefore says nothing by itself about how withdrawals are handled.
Amatic Online Casinos in the UK: How They Work
The distinction matters because the word “limit” can make unrelated rules seem like one system. A player may encounter a stake range at the table and separate payment terms elsewhere, but those details should not be treated as evidence for each other. Without the relevant terms, a precise statement about casino withdrawal ceilings would be as unsupported as a universal roulette cap.
For both games, the soundest reading is narrow: identify the exact table, its stated conditions and whether it is online or live. A general casino label cannot establish a particular limit, and the regulator’s broad remit does not turn into a published stake figure for every game. Roulette remains roulette; blackjack remains blackjack. The number belongs to the table’s rules, not to the name of the game.
High Limits Meet the Slot Stake Cap
“High limit” is a description of a casino’s offer, not an exemption from the rules governing online slots. A UK casino can use the phrase to signal that it caters for larger wagers in some parts of its service, but the label cannot raise the legal maximum stake on a slot game. Marketing language has no such authority.
Statutory Caps
Marketing labels like "high limit" cannot raise the legal maximum stake on online slot games.
For players aged 25 and over, the online slot stake cap is £5 per game cycle. It took effect on 9 April 2025. For players aged 18 to 24, the cap is £2 per game cycle, effective from 21 May 2025. The difference is set by age, not by the casino’s branding, the name of a game category or a customer’s preference for higher stakes.
That distinction matters because “high limit” can sound like a single status that applies across an entire casino. It is not. A venue may describe some of its products or tables as high limit, but that wording does not change the cap for online slots. A player moving from one kind of casino game to another is not carrying a higher slot allowance with them.
The rule is attached to the game cycle. A high-limit label cannot turn a stake above the relevant cap into a permitted slot stake, nor can an operator’s presentation of a game alter the age-based amount. The limit remains the same whether a slot is presented as a premium choice or sits among ordinary titles in a casino lobby.
This makes the phrase less useful as a guide to slot stakes than it may first appear. In a UK high-limit casino, it says nothing by itself about whether a particular slot permits a stake above the legal ceiling. For online slots, the applicable cap supplies the answer. The label does not.
The policy also draws a boundary between commercial positioning and regulated play. Casinos can organise their products and describe them in ways intended to attract different customers; the state sets the conditions under which remote gambling may be offered. Where those interests meet, the promotional description gives way to the rule.
Eyecon Slots at UK Online Casinos: Availability Guide
This is not a special restriction imposed only on casinos that advertise high limits. It applies to online slots across the market, with the relevant cap determined by the player’s age. A casino cannot offer an exception by calling a slot high limit, and a customer cannot acquire one through account status.
The phrase may still describe other parts of a casino’s offer. On slots, however, its reach stops at the statutory stake cap. Plainly put.
High-Limit Slots Under UK Rules
A slot described as high-limit or no-limit may suggest that the stake is a matter of preference. For online slots in Great Britain, that suggestion has a firm boundary: the permitted stake is capped for each game cycle. The label on a game cannot raise it.
For players aged 25 and over, the maximum stake is £5 per game cycle. That cap took effect on 9 April 2025. For players aged 18 to 24, the maximum is £2 per cycle, with the lower cap in force from 21 May 2025. These are not recommendations or settings that a casino can choose to ignore; they define the ceiling for online slot stakes under the UK rules.
The phrase “high-limit slots” can still describe how a game is presented, or the kind of experience a casino claims to offer. It does not create a separate class of online slot exempt from the cap. A large-looking stake selector, an extravagant game theme or marketing that invokes unlimited play cannot change the amount allowed on a single cycle.
There is also a difference between a stake limit and a promise about how a game will feel. A slot can remain visually dramatic, with bold symbols and a rising sense of anticipation, while operating within the same legal ceiling as other online slots. “No limit” is therefore a poor description if it implies unrestricted stakes. The rules are less theatrical.
Players 25+
Maximum stake of £5 per game cycle, effective from 9 April 2025.
Players 18-24
Maximum stake of £2 per game cycle, effective from 21 May 2025.
The age distinction matters because the cap is not identical for every adult player. A slot’s permitted maximum depends on whether the player is in the 18-to-24 age group or is 25 and over. A casino’s general description of its games should not obscure that difference; the applicable stake cap follows the player’s age category, not the game’s high-limit branding.
Anyone comparing online casino limits in the UK should read a slot’s label as marketing, not as evidence of a higher permitted stake. The relevant measure is the amount placed on each game cycle, subject to the age-based cap. A casino may use “high limit” to describe its offer, but no-limit slots cannot mean unlimited online slot stakes under these rules.
High-Limit Casinos and the Limits of the Evidence
“High-limit” sounds like a category with a boundary: a recognised class of casino, distinguished by what it lets customers stake. In practice, the phrase can be marketing language, and its meaning depends on what an operator is describing. Without a clearly stated, comparable basis, the label alone cannot establish which casino offers higher limits or make one a reliable choice over another.
That matters when assessing claims about high-limit casinos in the UK. A polished description may suggest a special tier, but it does not by itself show what limits apply to particular games, whether the same terms apply across an operator’s products, or how those terms compare elsewhere. Naming a “best” high-limit casino without that evidence would turn an impression into a recommendation.
NetEnt Slots at UK Online Casinos: What to Verify
UK regulation adds a different kind of limit to the picture. UKGC-licensed operators must prompt customers to set a financial limit before the first deposit. This is a required customer control, not proof that a casino belongs to a high-limit category. Nor does a casino’s use of high-limit language cancel that obligation. Commercial vocabulary and regulatory duties occupy different ground.
The distinction is easy to miss because both are expressed through the language of limits. One describes a claim about play; the other concerns a customer’s own finances. The required prompt is part of the regulated relationship between operator and customer, not a badge that ranks casinos or confirms that their advertised limits are unusually generous. Reductions to a customer’s financial limit must also be actioned immediately. The rule is concrete; the marketing label is not.
A careful comparison therefore needs more than a name and an adjective. It needs clear terms attached to the relevant game or product, and a basis for comparing like with like. Where that is not available, a list of supposedly superior high-limit online casinos would offer certainty the evidence cannot support. Restraint is less dazzling. It is also more honest.
Setting a Spending Limit Before Play
At a UKGC-licensed casino, a financial limit enters the process before the first deposit. The operator must prompt the customer to set one; it is not merely an optional reminder tucked away among account settings. That requirement places a pause between registration and funded play, making the decision about spending part of the account’s opening ritual.
Set Your Limits
- Respond to the operator’s financial limit prompt
- Determine a spending amount suited to your circumstances
- Define the period for the financial limit
- Verify that any requested limit reductions are actioned immediately
A deposit limit is one way of thinking about that control: it sets a boundary on money paid into the account. More broadly, a financial limit can help define what a customer is prepared to spend. The precise controls and labels may differ between operators, so the prompt itself matters: it is the moment to consider the amount and period that suit the customer’s circumstances, rather than accepting a setting without thought.
This is not the same as a casino’s table stakes or a game’s maximum permitted stake. Those describe what may be wagered on a particular play; a personal financial limit is a customer control over spending. The distinction is plain, though the interface can make every figure look like just another setting.
If a customer reduces a financial limit, the operator must action that reduction immediately. It is a firm point in a process otherwise shaped by each operator’s account design. The rule gives a lower limit practical force at once, rather than leaving it waiting in a queue.
The prompt is therefore more than a piece of compliance language. It makes the customer’s own boundary visible before money enters the account, at the point when a decision can still shape what follows. A limit cannot decide whether gambling is affordable, and setting one does not turn gambling into a harmless expense. But a spending boundary, chosen before play and reduced without delay when needed, is a concrete control rather than a slogan.
A “No-Limit Casino” Still Has Rules
The phrase “no-limit casino” can suggest a room in which the machinery of play has been loosened: faster turns, fewer interruptions, perhaps a sense that nothing stands between impulse and the next spin. For UK online slots, that picture runs into rules about how the game is designed. A label on a casino page cannot remove them.
Autoplay is prohibited. A player cannot set a slot to keep spinning on its own while attention moves elsewhere. Each spin also has to be separated from the next by a minimum interval of 2.5 seconds. The pause is brief, but it is deliberate: the game must not become a seamless stream in which decisions disappear into the rhythm of the machine.
Big Time Gaming Slots at UK Online Casinos: What to Check
That detail matters because “no limit” is often read as a statement about the experience as much as the money. Yet a regulated slot is not designed to obey every demand for speed or continuity. The interval makes the game’s separate rounds visible; the autoplay ban keeps each one tied to an active choice. Neither rule promises that play will feel slow. They simply prevent certain mechanics from removing those moments of separation.
A casino may use expansive language to describe its offer. The software still has to follow the rules that govern UK online slots. The spin must wait.
Real-Money Play and Bonus Wagering Caps
A casino’s real-money games and its bonus terms belong to different parts of the transaction. Money deposited for play is not the same thing as promotional funds, and a claim of “no limits” does not make the conditions attached to a bonus disappear. The distinction matters because wagering requirements concern bonus funds, not a general ceiling on how much can be wagered with cash.
In Great Britain, the UK Gambling Commission’s cap on wagering requirements for bonus funds took effect on 19 December 2025. A requirement cannot exceed ten times the bonus funds. This limits how much play an operator can require before bonus-related funds become withdrawable; it does not abolish bonus conditions or turn every promotion into cash with no conditions.
The cap also does not mean that real-money play is subject to a ten-times rule. It is a boundary on the playthrough attached to bonus funds. A promotion may still have other terms, so the wording of an offer remains relevant: which funds are promotional, what must be wagered, and what conditions apply to any winnings. The number is a ceiling, not a promise that every offer uses the same requirement.
That distinction is easily blurred in casino advertising, where “cash”, “bonus” and “winnings” can sit close together on a screen while carrying different conditions. The regulatory cap gives one firm limit to that language. It does not make the categories interchangeable. No-limit branding cannot remove it.
How does the UK’s 10× wagering cap affect Amatic casino bonuses?
At a UK-licensed casino, wagering requirements on bonus funds are capped at 10×, a rule in force since 19 December 2025. It applies to the operator’s bonus terms, not to Amatic as a game supplier.
Are Amatic slots covered by GamStop self-exclusion?
Yes, when you play them through a GB-licensed operator: GamStop has been mandatory for all such online operators since 31 March 2020. Amatic supplies games but does not run the casino account.
Do Amatic casinos work on mobile phones and tablets?
Yes. Amatic games generally run in a mobile browser as HTML5 games, without a download.
Do Amatic casinos on GamStop have self-exclusion options?
Yes. GB-licensed online operators must be part of GamStop, which lets customers self-exclude from participating gambling sites.